Republicans are the terrorists
Need proof?????
These filthy little neo-con scumbags will continue to call Democratic congressional members like John Murtha "defeatists" and claim they are "aiding the enemy". These enemies of America wanted this war since before 2000. PNAC members run this administration, and they got their war. They got their chance to experiment with "democracy" in the Middle East. Their Rebuilding America's Defenses, written in 2000, called for American empire building in the Middle East to secure America's economic and defense security; this doctrine failed. Rumsfeld, Armitage, Abrams, Bolton, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby were all members of this think tank. This is not conspiracy, this is FACT. Even though this idea has failed, this administration will push on with the plan, and Iran is next.
This experiment has nothing to do with fighting terrorism! It was scheduled to go before 9-11. These freaks will cast aspersions on anyone that disagrees with them. The proof is right there, and a couple of interesting news articles further strengthen the argument that GOP supporters are the TERRORISTS (some knowingly, some unknowingly).
Recently, a N.Y Republican donor was arrested on charges of giving financial aid to the terrorists. Not only was this enemy of America a Republican, he donated $15,000 to the Republican party itself!!! Why would a terrorist sympathizer subscribe to the Republican ideology??? This individual was celebrated by the GOP as the New York State Businessman of the Year in 2003... maybe because out of this war come huge profits, and aid to the terrorists helps prolong the war!
Yet, on the TV, they will call Murtha the traitor...
Worse yet, a story ignored by the media from December, Bush himself invited a radical Shiite, Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, to the White House. This individual has done everything possible to create friction among the Sunni and Shia; in other words, he is against a unified Iraq. al-Sadr is not the most dangerous individual on the Shia side in Iraq, it is this man, and Bush had an enemy of America visit the White House in December. Why??? Out of chaos comes a prolonged war, and increased presence in the Middle East means increased profits.
Last night, we covered this issue on the live broadcast. Look for the podcast on iTunes shortly.
These filthy little neo-con scumbags will continue to call Democratic congressional members like John Murtha "defeatists" and claim they are "aiding the enemy". These enemies of America wanted this war since before 2000. PNAC members run this administration, and they got their war. They got their chance to experiment with "democracy" in the Middle East. Their Rebuilding America's Defenses, written in 2000, called for American empire building in the Middle East to secure America's economic and defense security; this doctrine failed. Rumsfeld, Armitage, Abrams, Bolton, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Libby were all members of this think tank. This is not conspiracy, this is FACT. Even though this idea has failed, this administration will push on with the plan, and Iran is next.
This experiment has nothing to do with fighting terrorism! It was scheduled to go before 9-11. These freaks will cast aspersions on anyone that disagrees with them. The proof is right there, and a couple of interesting news articles further strengthen the argument that GOP supporters are the TERRORISTS (some knowingly, some unknowingly).
Recently, a N.Y Republican donor was arrested on charges of giving financial aid to the terrorists. Not only was this enemy of America a Republican, he donated $15,000 to the Republican party itself!!! Why would a terrorist sympathizer subscribe to the Republican ideology??? This individual was celebrated by the GOP as the New York State Businessman of the Year in 2003... maybe because out of this war come huge profits, and aid to the terrorists helps prolong the war!
Yet, on the TV, they will call Murtha the traitor...
Worse yet, a story ignored by the media from December, Bush himself invited a radical Shiite, Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, to the White House. This individual has done everything possible to create friction among the Sunni and Shia; in other words, he is against a unified Iraq. al-Sadr is not the most dangerous individual on the Shia side in Iraq, it is this man, and Bush had an enemy of America visit the White House in December. Why??? Out of chaos comes a prolonged war, and increased presence in the Middle East means increased profits.
Last night, we covered this issue on the live broadcast. Look for the podcast on iTunes shortly.
posted by Minister of Propaganda @ 2/20/2007 09:24:00 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home