The media keeps attacking Obama

The New York Times recently reported on Sen. Barack Obama's sale of stock that, it turns out, wasn't in as blind of a trust as he had initially thought. To the Senator's credit, as soon as he learned that the trust wasn't blind, he sold the stock at a $13,000 loss. The stockbroker in whose hands this trust was placed confirms Obama's recounting of the incident.

The first fact - that Obama held stock in companies that supported his campaign and had business in front of Congress - was seized on by the complicit media, both in print and on television, who subtly implied that Obama intentionally acted in an unethical fashion from the point of purchase of the stock. However, they dismissed his immediate sale of, and his loss on, the stock as invalid evidence that he is telling the truth. CNN's Wolf Blitzer repeated the accusation, even though the report airing immediately after debunked the claims of impropriety!

The complicit mainstream media is always happy to claim that a Democrat is a liar, and they spread the accusations of such, even if they are clearly untrue.