Reporting on Walter Reed = Not supporting the troops!

... at least according to those freaks over at KSFO.

Brian Sussman, who co-hosts a show with Melanie Morgan (freak!) and "Officer" Vic, and their guest, FreeRepublic.com's Kristinn Taylor, claim that the Washington Post "held onto" the Walter Reed story, "[sitting] on it until they were ready to ... hit their target at the right opportunity." Sussman then asserts that this shows that "the mainstream media doesn't support our troops. They don't support the mission. God forbid, they don't support the commander-in-chief."

What these HACKS don't realize is that good journalism takes time. Information must be compiled, sources must be vetted, and dots must be connected. If we turn our gaze back to the 2004 presidential election, CBS - and Dan Rather - was lambasted for not properly and thoroughly vetting documents that claimed that Bush's National Guard service was practically fraudulent.

So, good journalism is essential when it benefits the neo-con agenda, but is serving political opportunism when it accuses the neo-cons of impropriety. Just another classic case of right-wing projection tactics. Sickening!!!