Radio Equalizer: pathological liar, and a wing nut
Radio Equalizer, otherwise known as Brian Maloney, wrote about a tasteless joke Savage love ( a gay sex columnist) made on some obscure gay radio show.
I responded by asking him a few questions: Mainly is he equally offended by other off color comedians who are not gay?? The weasel took down my post and claimed it was obscene!!! Too bad I did not use a single foul word in the post.
I posted again the following in respnse to his censoring.......
Guess what? Maloney could not handle this and again said i used foul language, and took down the post.
So here you have it folks, wingers can not justify their own views. This freak Maloney is defending Fred Phelps by attacking the joke made by Savage Love!!!! This freak can not answer if he is offended by off color comedy by straight comedians........
Why can wing nuts not answer questions about their own beliefs.
Maloney has actually been on Oriley a few times. This is the level of filth FOX news will put on the air, a coward, who is freaking out over a gay guy making a joke about Fred Phelps!!
I responded by asking him a few questions: Mainly is he equally offended by other off color comedians who are not gay?? The weasel took down my post and claimed it was obscene!!! Too bad I did not use a single foul word in the post.
I posted again the following in respnse to his censoring.......
If you are so offended by Savage Love, you must be offended by Opie and Anthony, Jim Norton's"rape jokes" and Dice Clay as well... right???
I'm looking for consistency , you have none in your views.
I also pointed out, by defending the victim of this joke Fred Phelps, you are defending his Anti-troops viewpoint and also support "GOD HATES F*GS"
I used language in other posts, much worse.
Guess what? Maloney could not handle this and again said i used foul language, and took down the post.
So here you have it folks, wingers can not justify their own views. This freak Maloney is defending Fred Phelps by attacking the joke made by Savage Love!!!! This freak can not answer if he is offended by off color comedy by straight comedians........
Why can wing nuts not answer questions about their own beliefs.
Maloney has actually been on Oriley a few times. This is the level of filth FOX news will put on the air, a coward, who is freaking out over a gay guy making a joke about Fred Phelps!!
posted by Minister of Propaganda @ 10/23/2007 02:57:00 PM
24 Comments:
At October 23, 2007 3:09 PM,
EEprom said…
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
At October 23, 2007 3:17 PM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
Wingnut, kiss my ass, HACK. People are reading the blog and plenty, you ran here to comment brown tongue
At October 23, 2007 3:18 PM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
and I'm not the one who goes on Bill Oriley and still fails to get traffic to my site. Your icon Maloney gets no comments unles I post!!
wow ! The power Of oriley111
At October 24, 2007 1:01 AM,
elmonica said…
Unbelievable - fucking pathetic that Maloney deleted your comment MOP.
Maloney, You are spineless weasel piece of shit. Exactly the reason I stopped patronizing the Radioequalizer blog.
At October 24, 2007 12:12 PM,
Anonymous said…
I don't see any tears of regret on the Radioequalize blog about elmonica's voluntary departure or MOP's well-deserved forced removal.
Their constant spewing of venom and lack of any sort of facts or logic was their downfall.
Proof? Just read the two comments above this one.
At October 24, 2007 4:55 PM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
FACTS:
I used no obscene language in the post that your hero toe tapping Maloney censored...... I asked him a question, if he was so offended by Savage Love's joke, would he not be offended by shock comedians lik Dice Clay and Jim Norton. i also indicated that by attacking Savage Love's joke, he is defending Fred "God hates fags" Phelps.
and maloney was on Oriley, 4 times at least, and every time, there was no increase in comments or hits to his blog.
FACTS
stop projecting, only liars are YOU, and 70% of America gets it already
CONS are PATHOLOGICAL LIARS
I have humiliated and destroyed each and every mentally ill conservafreak on his blog for 2 years now.
America is with ME, America despises the right
Don't you have a todler to pick on or something? Better yet, go to Islamo-fascism week with David Horowitz, ohhh wait, it bombed and they LIED about the amount of schools that participated, even Pat robertson university turned it down. So what school had Islamo-fascism week, under 200 for sure. Another case of conservative liars.
stop proecting, that is all you mentally ill freaks do
In closing
FUCK YOU
FUCK MALONEY
FUCK RNC RADIO
FUCK THE RADICAL RIGHT
I loathe, detest and despise the right. Everything about you, makes me want to hurl. I'm tired of the lies, projection and obfuscation. Be happy the media still get's on their knees for the GOP, becuse if the media was objective, the GOP would not even exist anymore
DRO
At October 24, 2007 9:29 PM,
Anonymous said…
Not so fast, you Anti-american low life, toe-tapping, degenerate freak.
You are a dirty, vile, disgusting, miscreant, freak of nature.
Libs make me so fucking sick, I'm ashamed they are part of this great nation.
Gee, I wonder where I heard these words of wisdom?
Two can play your sick perverted game!
At October 25, 2007 9:35 AM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
Hey anon
After 20 years of RNC radio hate, I hit back. You do not own the language of acrimony.
now go beat up on a 2 year old on S-chip or some phony soldiers
Your talking points are waiting for you..... Take your radio the next time Limbaugh is on into the bathtub with you
At October 25, 2007 10:21 AM,
Anonymous said…
Acrimony?
Wow! A 4 syllable word. You must be using a thesaurus now, you sack of shit.
You own the language of hate.
At October 27, 2007 9:47 AM,
hashfanatic said…
I certainly commented on the new censorship drill on Maloney's site and-surprise-my comments haven't appeared yet, presumably because of the comments moderation and the fact that neocons are inherently weak-willed, lazy, and fundamentally dishonest.
It would not surprise me one iota if Maloney simply is using false charges of profanity in order to suppress ideas or challenges to his idiotic rants...he's paid handsomely to keep the agitprop flowing, not to stimulate and foster intelligent debate.
When they should you what type of insect life they are, is there any reason not to believe your eyes?
At October 27, 2007 4:42 PM,
elmonica said…
Maloney has finally implemented comment moderation eh. Somewhat ironic after all my jibes about it.
So are you through commenting on the RadioEqualizer MOP?
At October 29, 2007 5:12 AM,
Karol said…
America is with ME, America despises the right
Ya, that's why they re-elected Bush in '04. Because they're with you.
How was Brian defending Phelps in any way at all? You're not even making sense. And, you know Phelps is a Democrat, right? Friend of Al Gore, etc? As Rosie might say: Google it.
This post is really empty as is your rage-filled comment above. Perhaps if you formulated an argument instead of cursing in all caps, Brian might take you seriously.
At October 29, 2007 11:19 AM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
Fred Phelps is insane, I doubt he is a friend of Gore, this is the "God hates Fags" guy, Karol.
...by attacking the stupid joke Savage Love made, Maloney is indeed defending the victim of the joke Fred Phelps.
If someone made a tasteless joke about Hitler , would you attack the comedian who made the joke?? Would you dedicate a blog post to attacking the comedian who attacked Hitler???
See where I'm comming from? It makes perfect logical sense.
Anyway I will look into Gore and Phelps, sounds too interesting to pass up on.
Readers: Karol is a friend of Ralph and I for many years. Her blog is pretty good for a Right Wing blog. Alarmingnews.com
Brian Maloney is a HACK, his love of Limbaugh is sickening. However, his blog has helped this radio show attract new listeners, as Liberals love to read his blog for laughs
At October 29, 2007 11:23 AM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
Karol:
Ya, that's why they re-elected Bush in '04. Because they're with you.
Black box unverifiable voting, we all know this already. Voter supression and mystery Diebold machines.
Karol, if a Democrat won and Black box voting was used in the state where it all came down to.... would you lie down dead and accept it, or would you question the unverifiable voting machines????
mmmmmmmmmm.....
the sounds of "let us in" being chanted by right wingers in 2000, stopping the recount in Floridia, will be remembered for centuries in America, the Day democracy died and right wing zealots used violence to stop a recount.
Histroy will prove Ralph and I right, 2000 was stolen, 2004 was stolen, history will prove me right.
I will expect a "hey Jared you were right".
later
At October 29, 2007 11:47 AM,
elmonica said…
Hello Karol,
As a friend of Ralph and Jareds, you are exempted from a good cursing out.
Nuts!
At October 29, 2007 12:10 PM,
Karol said…
I swear it's only because I like you guys that I'm even trying to argue with you.
Are you telling me that if Hitler was added to the shortlist of people Savage had a choice to sleep with then I would feel differently about the "joke" being tasteless and idiotic? No. I wouldn't.
"Black box voting", Jesus, Jared, do you know how nuts that sounds? You really can't be serious. 2000 was a solid attempt by the Democrats to steal in an election. It just didn't work. I don't know why that makes you believe every other election is stolen too. You know every liberal outfit in the land recounted all the votes in Florida again and again when it was all over and Bush still won, right? And it's just all so dramatic "democracy dying" and all. I'm sure you feel the same about Mayor Daly handing Illinois to JFK in 1960, right?
Like I wrote before, tone down the rage. It's not healthy and it's no way to win an argument.
At October 29, 2007 1:43 PM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
2000 election, They recounted twice, without all the ballots, the recount that was stopped was the full recount, which was later reported when finally counted in I believe 2003, Gore won! you can google the final recount results, it's buried....
black box voting: This is an issue being debated in the House, the issue is computerized voting with or without a paper trail. in 2004, blackbox AKA Diebold electronic voting machines were used, without a printable vote count, just a computer tally. Of course, you understand a computer is easy to hack, Ron Paul supporters are possible fudging internet polls (as a quick example). I think you can agree with me, that electronic voting machines need a verifiable printable vote count, a paper printout for EACH vote.
Black box voting is a a big issue, the Repubs are against a paper trail. WHY??? Why no paper trail??
It makes you guys seem very guilty when your afraid of a paper print out of votes......
....and as far as Dems cheating. the repubs accuse "illegals" of voting over and over again, after independent investigations, there has been not a SINGLE case of voter fraud. Gonzales fired 2 attorneys for not being able to cook up the "voter fraud". It simply did not exist.
What does exist is voter supression in Democratic areas in Ohio, as in 2 voting booths in a polling area to create long lines of people(in an effort to get people to leave and not vote) and possible "election fraud", from electronic machines. We don't know if there was ELECTION FRAUD in 2004, there is no paper trail. See how this works.
I don't sound crazy, electronic/black box voting has been debated on the floor of the House, John conyers has a 250+ page book on the matter... I don't make this stuff up. THIS IS NEWS, the mainstream media decided is not important. If you watch FOX, you would never know, when you vote with a black box/ Diebold machine, your vote has no printable verification, but only a computer code.
Think about it.
hey Elmonica! and Hash
we will be live NExT monday, we are off this week.
At October 29, 2007 2:00 PM,
hashfanatic said…
Karol, you're not the same one who organized the little protest at ground zero and asked kevin mccullough to promote it, are you?
something like seven people showed up
if it was you, and with all respect, don't associate yourself with cretins like that in the future, if you knew what his real agenda was, you'd run screaming anyway
anyway, good luck to you in your future pursuits
"history will prove me right"
oh, absolutely, jared, history will prove us right on many things, may we only merit to live to see the day
point being, we don't have much time to spare
yes, maloney is throwing his blog comments "under heavy manners" but he has had very few comments since you haven't posted, and isn't even posting new articles, so i suspect he will relent soon, unless it is his benefactress who has ordered a "cleanup" of sorts, which is entirely possible
so, we will check you out here, until the "checkpoints" have been dismantled
have a good week, also to ralph, who has been good enough to respond here when you are otherwise occupied
keep up the good work
At October 29, 2007 6:17 PM,
Karol said…
Jared, Gore only wanted a partial recount. When the full recount was done (by the NY Times, Wash Post and a slew of liberal groups) Bush was the winner every time. Here's PBS on the subject:
"In the aftermath of the election, independent recounts were conducted by The Miami Herald and USA Today, concluding that Bush would have won in all legally requested recount scenarios, and in all other scenarios except for "a fresh recount in all counties using the most generous standards,” which would have gone to Gore [5]."
Seriously, time to let go.
Yes, Hashfanatic, I was the one who organized the counterprotest, and Kevin McCullough is a friend of mine. Your "7" number is as accurate as the claims of stolen elections. We had 20-25 people who handed out 1000 pamphlets in less than an hour. It was a wild success, even on a rainy Tuesday.
Jared, for the love of Foster, please tell me you're not also a "Bush knew about 9/11" nut. Please. PLEASE.
At November 01, 2007 7:41 AM,
hashfanatic said…
"Kevin McCullough is a friend of mine..."
Well, you won't find many New Yorkers eager to admit to that one.
"We had 20-25 people who handed out 1000 pamphlets in less than an hour. It was a wild success, even on a rainy Tuesday."
If that's your definition of success, you might do well to redefine your own usefulness to this nation as a whole, and maybe raise your bar...just.a.bit.higher?
"...for the love of Foster..."
Vince Foster, or Foster Avenue?
At November 02, 2007 10:16 AM,
Minister of Propaganda said…
She is refering to Foster Ave, where we all used to hang out in our youth!
With this administraton and their secrecy any 9-11 conspiracy is plausible, it is quite possible they knew and did nothing
their secrecy and shady activity makes the cpnspiracy theories possible.
At November 02, 2007 1:07 PM,
Karol said…
With this administraton and their secrecy any 9-11 conspiracy is plausible, it is quite possible they knew and did nothing
That's just sick, honestly. I don't care what your politics are, we're all Americans. I hated the Clinton administration but at no point did I think they'd look away while terrorists tried to kill me. I think it's completely unhinged to believe in that kind of conspiracy, in addition to it just plum not making sense. Come to my debate on Wed., Jared: http://www.alarmingnews.com/archives/006622.html
And Hashfanatic, I represent the side of reason. And, reasonable people tend to have jobs, families, lives, etc. and don't have time to participate in protests. I felt it was something I needed to do to counter the nutjobs who desecrate the memory of every person that died that day by showing up and yelling their heads off on the anniversary. So, yeah, I'm as happy with the result as I was when I worked for Bush in '04 and he won 2 out 3 of the counties I managed in South Colorado, counties that hadn't gone Republican since Reagan. So, see, I do set the bar quite high and I usually meet it.
At July 28, 2008 3:25 PM,
juandos said…
Suprise! Suprise!
Yet another libtard thinks its O.K. to pander to pervs but in the libtards own bent viewpoint other viewpoints shouldn't exist...
At February 11, 2009 9:48 AM,
Bruce said…
Suck a fat one, juandos.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home