Thursday, July 26, 2007

Greatest Hits segments

04/16/07: The Troops... or the War?

05/21/07: Is This Freedom... or Fascism?

05/07/07: The Republican Non-Debate, Part 2

01/01/07: Mavericks on a Ship of Failure

12/21/06: Sound Clip Review, Part 1

Enjoy the ELPN review!

BREAKING: GONZO PERJURY UNDER OATH!

AP reported 5 minutes ago:


FBI Director Robert S. Mueller said Thursday the government's terrorist surveillance program was the topic of a 2004 hospital room dispute between top Bush administration officials, contradicting Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' sworn Senate testimony.
Mueller was not in the hospital room at the time of the dramatic March 10, 2004, confrontation between then-Attorney General John Ashcroft and presidential advisers Andy Card and Gonzales, who was then serving as White House counsel. Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee he arrived shortly after they left, and spoke with the ailing Ashcroft.

CNN touched on this news, included is a clip of Mueller

He LIED under oath FOLKS. This is the strongest case of perjury yet!! Let me guess the right wing excuses and talking points (coming soon to Fox News, talk radio and conservative publications): "how can Mueller remember something from 2004" or "Mueller is part of moveon.org" or how about "Mueller is a traitor undermining our efforts to fight terror"??? Which excuse are these right wing hacks going to use now? Gonzales MUST resign now. The Democrats must pursue the perjury charge, just like they are pursuing the contempt charge against Miers and Joshua Bolton.

This has taken quite a while, thanks to the stubborn scumbag-in-chief refusing to stop supporting Gonzo! We at the ELPN predicted a much earlier demise of Gonzo, it looks like the Democrats may have to charge him with a crime in order for him to step down. Knowing Gonzo and Cheney/Bush, he may have to be impeached in order to get rid of this cancer on the Department Of Justice.

O'Reilly, King of Hypocrisy

In previous posts, I've commented on the O'Lielly attacks on jetBlue and DailyKos.com over the "YearlyKos" conference and comments to the Daily Kos message board. I've also mentioned how O'Lielly's own message board is likely more hateful than most liberal boards.

What I will tell you now truly takes the prize for hypocrisy.

Billy Boy has been claiming that anyone leaving hateful speech on his message board akin to the comments he repeatedly references from DailyKos will have their comment deleted, etc. Well, someone left quite the hateful post on O'Lielly's message board. Two brand-new, paid subscribers to O'Lielly's website (John Aravosis of americablog.com and BarbinMD of dailykos.com) e-mailed the admin to notify him of the "hate speech" in the comment.

The admin's reply? Well, let's just say billoreilly.com is less two liberals today.

Legislating for the corporation: Republicans at their finest

The Democrats proposed legislation that would make it harder for overseas companies to use tax havens to avoid taxes on U.S. profits ; naturally the "by the corporation, for the corporation" Republicans are shrieking about this sensible proposal. In the world of Republican politics, forcing a company to pay their fair share in an "unfair tax hike", how is it a "tax hike" if these companies are using a loop hole to being with? They are not paying their fair share but companies who are located within the US exclusively pay their fair share. The overseas tax loophole allows companies to benefit from cheaper foreign labor and pay less taxes. Why would the GOP want to end this kind of handout?


Once more the G.O.P looking out for the better good of the American people..... well the American people who own corporations that function mainly overseas!


Expect this to pass congress and be vetoed immediately by the scumbag-in-chief. I don't think this kind of measure needs to go to the Senate ( I could be wrong) If it has to go to the Senate, expect a filibuster by Republican obstructionists!

Speaking of vetos by the scumbag-in-chief.......

Washington post reports:

President Bush yesterday rejected entreaties by his Republican allies that he compromise with Democrats on legislation to renew a popular program that provides health coverage to poor children, saying that expanding the program would enlarge the role of the federal government at the expense of private insurance. The president said he objects on philosophical grounds to a bipartisan Senate proposal to boost the State Children's Health Insurance Program by $35 billion over five years. Bush has proposed $5 billion in increased funding and has threatened to veto the Senate compromise and a more
costly expansion being contemplated in the House.
Expect the few Republicans with compassion to cave right in to Bush's veto threaten! You wonder why I'm calling him scumbag-in-chief!!!

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Gonzo: lied under oath again!

Gonzales claimed that Ashcroft was not being pressured about warrantless wiretapping when Gonzales and Comey visited Ashcroft in the hospital, but rather "other intelligence activities".

According to Sen. Jay Rockefeller who was a ranking Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee at the time, there was only one intelligence program, the NSA program. Rep.Jane Harman basically made the same point, there was only one NSA program.

Sounds like Gonzo lied under oath about the Comey testimony. Comey was not lying when he testified abut the occurrence at Ashcroft's hospital room, Gonzo was trying desperately get Ashcroft to go along with illegal warrentless wiretapping.

So there is no need to speculate about "other programs", let's stick with what we know. We know that Gonzo tried to take advantage of a very sick John Ashcroft by pressuring him into signing away our privacy, via warrentless wiretapping with no court oversight.

We also now have another solid, confirmed Gonzo lie, under oath!

I guess this is what the GOP considers strong and accountable leadership. An attorney general who can not speak a sentence without committing perjury!!!

In another hysterical moment from the testimony yesterday, Schumer tears into Gonzo's lies

Bush: think tanks do the thinking, he does the talking!!

The examiner explains how the American enterprise institute created the surge! As Ralph and I have said all along, Bush is not the decider, neo-conservative think tanks are!

Speaking of the decider.... Did you catch his speech in South Carolina on the T.V yesterday? Bush said Al queda over 90 times! I'm not exaggerating. count for yourself! Transcript and audio here : Whitehouse.gov

Monday, July 23, 2007

Feingold should have Reid's job!

At least one Democrat in the Senate has something resembling balls.

Yesterday, Sen. Feingold (D-WI) announced that he will introduce resolutions to censure President Bush.

Today, he took on comments by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who had previously referred to last week's unsuccessful attempt to break the filibuster with an all-night session as a "stunt." Feingold pointed out that the only "stunt" going on is the one the GOP is pulling that keeps killing American soldiers in Iraq.

Bravo, Sen. Feingold. Now, let's get on with it... and make your voice loud and clear on this. True patriotic Americans will stand with you!!!

Creepy Kristol.....

Kristol has been all over the t.v lately defending the Iraq war, he received even more airtime after he wrote his op-ed defending Bush and declaring that history will remember him as one of the greatest!
Howard Kurtz reports Bush loved Kristol's op-edadgivesusalittleackground on this creep.....

Here is Kristol's op-ed from last week. David Corn wrote an op-ed putting Kristol and Bush to shame. Kristol joined Bill O'riley in bashing the Daily Kos! on Fox news. Kristol rips the Democratic candidate's wives and gives Tommy Thompson the pass...


The fact remains this freak still plays a big influence with the Bush regime.......

A veritable cornucopia of neo-con douchebaggery!

So much has happened in the past few days. Let's begin with our Commander-in-Chimp, George "W stands for witless" Bush, and his doting admirer, William Kristol:

- Kristol, chief asshat at the National Review, writes what can be best described as a glowing review of Bush's presidency in the Washington Post. Bush reads this and recommends it to his staff. (Possibly the most impressive part of this whole thing is that Bush can actually read!) Howard Kurtz points out the level of hackery and outright lying and deception that Kristol expects the public to accept as truth, even as the public's eyes see quite the opposite picture, as noted by Bush's abysmal approval ratings.

- Kristol then goes on FOX News Sunday morning and rips into Bill O'Lielly's favorite target of late, the YearlyKos convention, and Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, who founded the DailyKos blog, calling him "not respectable," referring to one offhand line in a post from a few years back. Juan Williams, fortunately, is there to lay the verbal smackdown on Kristol's idiocy. Of course, the National Review wants everyone to know it considers Kristol to be "respectable." ThinkProgress compiles what "respectable" speech looks like to the National Review. The DailyKos blog also notes what "respectable" speech looks like when it comes from the O'Lielly message boards.

- The Director of National Intelligence now admits that the Bush White House manipulated the Iraq intelligence "because they didn't like the answers." This lovely tidbit is found in a new biography on Dick "Go Fuck Yourself" Cheney, who, we also learn, considered the Vice Presidency of the United States a "cruddy job" a few years prior to his acceptance of being the VP of the dumbest president ever.

- Even David Brooks admits he has to pull numbers out of his ass to make Bush's Iraq policy look like it makes sense. Sen. John Sununu (R-NH) doesn't want Bush anywhere near him as he desperately campaigns to keep his Senate seat after 2008.

- Steven Thomma with McClatchy Newspapers reminds us all that Bush has not been able to sell any of his policies effectively throughout his presidency.

- Walter Pincus over at WaPo reveals some interesting - and scary - facts about an executive order Bush recently signed, entitled "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq." Let's just say that we are moving closer to Soviet-style thought policing: Disagree with the ruling party, and you may find yourself in a whole mess of trouble.

- From the Oregonian: Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR), a member of the House Homeland Security Committee (HSC), wanted to double-check the language used in the White House's plan for operating the government in the event of another terrorist attack. As a member of the House HSC, he has the right to access these documents... yet he was denied access to those plans. DeFazio's response: "Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right."

- Congressional Republicans are on pace to set records for legislative obstructionism. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard calls them "an unusually effective minority."

- Finally, king douchebag Karl Rove was described as "so inept and so inartful" by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings when Rove attempted to date her in the early '80's - advances which she clearly rebuffed. That ineptitude and inartfulness showed in a letter he recently wrote to Moby, who had joked that Rove may be his long-lost brother.

Do dems really want to win???

The N.Y times reports:

Democratic leaders in the House and Senate are slowing their drive to revamp the nation’s voting systems,




In other words
after all the problems with the electronic voting machines in 2000,
2004 and 2006, the Democratic party has no interest in fixing the
problems with our nation's voting system. Shame on the Democratic
party... No guts to fight!



Washington post reports this:

Bush administration officials unveiled a
bold new assertion of executive authority yesterday in the dispute over
the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, saying that the Justice Department
will never be allowed to pursue contempt charges initiated by Congress
against White House officials once the president has invoked executive
privilege.



Do you think the Democratic party is
prepared for this fight? I highly doubt it. If the justice department
can not hold someone in contempt of court, why even have a justice
department????? This administration does whatever they want, and
cowardly democrats talk and talk and talk.

Remember all the
talk about fixing the election system? Did they act on it? What makes
you think these cowards will do anything regarding this situation of
Republicans ignoring suponeas?